2013年6月英语六级作文点睛题（1）

　　作文作为英语四级考试、英语六级考试一个非常重要的内容，各位考生应该充分重视起来。那么在最后的备考时间里，各位考生该如何复习呢？听听新东方王兆飞老师给大家的建议吧。

　　2013年6月大学英语六级考试将于6月15日(星期六)进行。届时新东方在线四六级频道将在考后公布2013年6月英语六级试题及答案，请考生随时关注新东方在线英语四六级栏目 ，新东方在线祝大家顺利通过考试!

　　考试结束后，新东方在线将发布2013英语四六级真题及英语四六级答案!

　　点击查看：2013年6月英语六级真题及答案专题

　　点击查看：2013年6月英语六级作文预测专题

　　点击查看：英语六级历年真题专题

　　考生可收藏新东方在线四六级频道，查看更多关于四六级考试相关的信息。

　　到现在一篇没练的同学，至少练一下前四道。练过的同学，可以选择自己没练过的题型练练。各种题型都练过的同学，可以侧重看看这些模拟题范文里的论据和关键的话题词，也可以用默写或对译的方式来检查自己的语言质量。想要瞒天过海、侥幸过关的同学可以只背前四篇里面划线的部分。

　　你要说押题押中的可能性有多大，我即使告诉你有百分之九十九也没用，因为你很可能死在那剩余的百分之一上，那百分之一可能是像四级曾经考过的事故见证书，导游词，招新启示，有个锤子模板可用？

　　所以，在背诵一些模板句垫底的基础上，更应该动手练几篇，找找写作的手感，夯实一批自己喜欢用的好词好句，暴露自己的常见词汇和语法问题，然后通过查字典和对照范文来改正。

　　写作模拟题

　　（一）对立观点型

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition of at least 150 words but no more than 200 words according to the following information:

　　Currently, a number of schools allow students to grade their teachers and even decide if the teachers can teach on or not. This has given rise to a heated debate, with some approving of the pratice and others strongly opposed to it. Now discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　参考范文

　　（一）对立观点型

　　1. Is It Up to Students to Evaluate Teachers?

　　The past few years have witnessed a mounting number ofuniversities allowing students to evaluate their teachers and even decide if they can stay on their positions or not. To this practice, people’s attitudes differ considerably. Some applaud it warmly whereas others criticize and even condemn it harshly.

　　Proponents of the practice may list the following reasons. In the first place, they assert thatstudents are the people who know the most clearly about the teaching performance of a teacher, so they should have the say in evaluating him or her. In the second place, they contend thatstudents have paid for their education, so they have the right to decide which teacher should be employed.

　　Opponents, however, point out that it is dangerous toleave the right to students to evaluate teachers. For one thing,students may not know what ought to be taught and how it should be taught; they may only judge a teacher according to his temper and even accent or appearance.For another,in order to please students, some teachers may resort to some improper means.

　　Personally, I believe that both views are justifiable, and we should achieve a balance between them by employingthe evaluating approach in a reasonable and beneficial way. To be specific,students should be allowed toevaluate their teachers, butthey may not be the only decision-maker in the teachers’ fate.

　　(Personally, I think that both sides have something right.Actually,lottery games should be viewed as a two-edged sword, which presents us with both benefits and troubles. But we should not give up eating for fear of choking. The best policy, as I see it, is to maximize their advantages and eliminate their unhealthy side-effects. Or in other words, we should further developlottery games and exert proper supervision over them so that they can benefit us in a better way.)